<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Caging Reports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onepretentiousbastard.com/2008/09/19/more-caging-reports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onepretentiousbastard.com/2008/09/19/more-caging-reports/</link>
	<description>Musings of an aging Gen-Xer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:02:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: officergleason</title>
		<link>http://onepretentiousbastard.com/2008/09/19/more-caging-reports/#comment-2501</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[officergleason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onepretentiousbastard.com/2008/09/19/more-caging-reports/#comment-2501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And given the history of republican voter suppression operations, I&#039;d vote the latter.   Thus far, I have not seen anything to indicate that these lists are a valid tool to challenge the voter rolls.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And given the history of republican voter suppression operations, I&#8217;d vote the latter.   Thus far, I have not seen anything to indicate that these lists are a valid tool to challenge the voter rolls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonolan</title>
		<link>http://onepretentiousbastard.com/2008/09/19/more-caging-reports/#comment-2500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonolan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onepretentiousbastard.com/2008/09/19/more-caging-reports/#comment-2500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;ll depend then - as far as legitimacy goes - if the foreclosure list is a list of foreclosed homes or homes &lt;i&gt;in the process of foreclosure.&lt;/i&gt; My personal bet is that it&#039;s the former.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll depend then &#8211; as far as legitimacy goes &#8211; if the foreclosure list is a list of foreclosed homes or homes <i>in the process of foreclosure.</i> My personal bet is that it&#8217;s the former.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://onepretentiousbastard.com/2008/09/19/more-caging-reports/#comment-2493</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onepretentiousbastard.com/2008/09/19/more-caging-reports/#comment-2493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weird story that got a lot of traction very quickly; John Conyers was beating McCain over the head with it a little while ago (despite the fact that McCain wouldn&#039;t have had anything to do with the detailed workings of a county GOP chapter, I guess).  We&#039;ll have to see what else shakes out of this.

Looks like Macomb is a heavily split county politically; I went back and dug up 2004 vote results.  It went for Bush over Kerry by 6000 votes, but has two House districts in it; the 10th Congressional went 69% for the Republican, the 12th went 64% for the Democrat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird story that got a lot of traction very quickly; John Conyers was beating McCain over the head with it a little while ago (despite the fact that McCain wouldn&#8217;t have had anything to do with the detailed workings of a county GOP chapter, I guess).  We&#8217;ll have to see what else shakes out of this.</p>
<p>Looks like Macomb is a heavily split county politically; I went back and dug up 2004 vote results.  It went for Bush over Kerry by 6000 votes, but has two House districts in it; the 10th Congressional went 69% for the Republican, the 12th went 64% for the Democrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: officergleason</title>
		<link>http://onepretentiousbastard.com/2008/09/19/more-caging-reports/#comment-2490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[officergleason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onepretentiousbastard.com/2008/09/19/more-caging-reports/#comment-2490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jonolan:

You linked info for military personnel and expats.  I did find this, 

&quot;The National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) of 1993, requires that individuals be given the opportunity to register to vote or to change their voter registration data when applying for or receiving services or assistance at any office designated as a voter registration agency. &quot;

Which would lead me to think that a person who has lost their house would be allowed to register their new address.  

If a person has moved, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,1607,7-127-1633_11619_38093-123989--,00.html#5&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Michigan&lt;/a&gt; requires:
&quot;Whenever you move to a new city or township, you must re-register to vote. If you move within a city or township, you must update your address. This can be handled through your local clerk, at a Secretary of State branch office, or by mail. Michigan voters must use the same residential address for voter registration and driver&#039;s license purposes. Consequently, if you submit a driver&#039;s license address change, it will be applied to your voter registration. Similarly, if you submit a voter registration address change, it will be applied to your driver&#039;s license.&quot;

If a person is in the process of foreclosure and still lives in on that property, then they are still eligible to vote in that district, at least according to J. Gerald Hebert, the gentleman quoted in the updated post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonolan:</p>
<p>You linked info for military personnel and expats.  I did find this, </p>
<p>&#8220;The National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) of 1993, requires that individuals be given the opportunity to register to vote or to change their voter registration data when applying for or receiving services or assistance at any office designated as a voter registration agency. &#8221;</p>
<p>Which would lead me to think that a person who has lost their house would be allowed to register their new address.  </p>
<p>If a person has moved, <a href="http://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,1607,7-127-1633_11619_38093-123989--,00.html#5" rel="nofollow">Michigan</a> requires:<br />
&#8220;Whenever you move to a new city or township, you must re-register to vote. If you move within a city or township, you must update your address. This can be handled through your local clerk, at a Secretary of State branch office, or by mail. Michigan voters must use the same residential address for voter registration and driver&#8217;s license purposes. Consequently, if you submit a driver&#8217;s license address change, it will be applied to your voter registration. Similarly, if you submit a voter registration address change, it will be applied to your driver&#8217;s license.&#8221;</p>
<p>If a person is in the process of foreclosure and still lives in on that property, then they are still eligible to vote in that district, at least according to J. Gerald Hebert, the gentleman quoted in the updated post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonolan</title>
		<link>http://onepretentiousbastard.com/2008/09/19/more-caging-reports/#comment-2488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonolan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onepretentiousbastard.com/2008/09/19/more-caging-reports/#comment-2488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s the federal regulations. You&#039;ll have to check each state for specific requirements; they vary in detail.

http://www.fvap.gov/reference/laws/vote-reg-guide/index.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the federal regulations. You&#8217;ll have to check each state for specific requirements; they vary in detail.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fvap.gov/reference/laws/vote-reg-guide/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fvap.gov/reference/laws/vote-reg-guide/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: officergleason</title>
		<link>http://onepretentiousbastard.com/2008/09/19/more-caging-reports/#comment-2487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[officergleason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onepretentiousbastard.com/2008/09/19/more-caging-reports/#comment-2487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jonolan:  Can you please link to the site that has information on this topic?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonolan:  Can you please link to the site that has information on this topic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonolan</title>
		<link>http://onepretentiousbastard.com/2008/09/19/more-caging-reports/#comment-2486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonolan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onepretentiousbastard.com/2008/09/19/more-caging-reports/#comment-2486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually under the residency requirements, the people ANYWHERE who&#039;ve been foreclosed on can&#039;t vote unless they have filed in their new precinct - assuming they have one.

That is and has been the law. We&#039;ll have to see if it&#039;s fairly enforced though - I could see both sides in swing precincts misusing this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually under the residency requirements, the people ANYWHERE who&#8217;ve been foreclosed on can&#8217;t vote unless they have filed in their new precinct &#8211; assuming they have one.</p>
<p>That is and has been the law. We&#8217;ll have to see if it&#8217;s fairly enforced though &#8211; I could see both sides in swing precincts misusing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

